>>>>> " " == Frank Cusack <fcusack@fcusack.com> writes:
> Hi, [Previously sent to nfs@sourceforge with no response]
> I'm using a frankenstein kernel, 2.4.21-rc3 with some -ac bits,
> and 2.5.69 NFS+RPC backported to it. Like the CITI kernel (for
> krb5), but a little more aggressive on the bits backported.
> For the purpose of this email, I think the code I have
> questions with is similar or even identical from
> 2.4.21->2.5.69. I can reproduce this problem on a RH
> 2.4.20-9smp kernel.
> Consider these two shells running on the same machine:
> 1 2
> cd /nfs cd /nfs mkdir t echo foo > t/foo less t/foo
> [less waits for input]
> rm -rf t
> 'v'
> [vi tries to access tmp/foo]
> At this point, fs/nfs/inode.c:__nfs_refresh_inode() prints the
> "inode number mismatch" error. AFAICT, this is just noise, but
> the noise is driving me crazy. :-)
Inode number mismatch points to either an an obvious server error (it
is not providing unique filehandles) or corruption of the fattr struct
that was passed to nfs_refresh_inode().
Cheers,
Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 07 2003 - 22:00:23 EST