Re: [PATCH] 1/2 Add exposure of the irq delivery mask on x86

From: Keith Mannthey (kmannth@us.ibm.com)
Date: Thu May 22 2003 - 17:50:35 EST

Next message: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: IDE 2.5.69 possible bogosity..."
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: userspace irq balancer"
Maybe in reply to: James Bottomley: "[PATCH] 1/2 Add exposure of the irq delivery mask on x86"
Next in thread: Keith Mannthey: "Re: [PATCH] 1/2 Add exposure of the irq delivery mask on x86"
Reply: Keith Mannthey: "Re: [PATCH] 1/2 Add exposure of the irq delivery mask on x86"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>>This exposes a delivery mask in /proc/<irq>/mask for the userspace irq
>>balancer to use in its calculations.

What exactly are you trying to expose? These patches look to just show
what cpus are on-line. Wouldn't this just be the cpu_online_map in all
cases? I guess I am a little confuses by what a "delivery mask" is.

Thanks,
Keith

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: IDE 2.5.69 possible bogosity..."
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: userspace irq balancer"
Maybe in reply to: James Bottomley: "[PATCH] 1/2 Add exposure of the irq delivery mask on x86"
Next in thread: Keith Mannthey: "Re: [PATCH] 1/2 Add exposure of the irq delivery mask on x86"
Reply: Keith Mannthey: "Re: [PATCH] 1/2 Add exposure of the irq delivery mask on x86"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:52 EST