Re: e100 latency, cpu cycle saver and e1000...

From: Zwane Mwaikambo (zwane@linuxpower.ca)
Date: Thu May 22 2003 - 00:46:33 EST

Next message: Ted Kremenek: "[CHECKER] 12 potential leaks in kernel 2.5.69"
Previous message: Paul Rolland: "Re: e100 latency, cpu cycle saver and e1000..."
In reply to: Paul Rolland: "Re: e100 latency, cpu cycle saver and e1000..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 22 May 2003, Paul Rolland wrote:

> Of course, the problem may be completely unrelated to the NIC,
> my initial question being : is there a CPU Cycle Saver on the e1000
> as there is one on the e100... ;-)

I suppose you could call the hardware RX/TX interrupt mitigation a 'cpu
cycle saver'

Zwane

-- 
function.linuxpower.ca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ted Kremenek: "[CHECKER] 12 potential leaks in kernel 2.5.69"
Previous message: Paul Rolland: "Re: e100 latency, cpu cycle saver and e1000..."
In reply to: Paul Rolland: "Re: e100 latency, cpu cycle saver and e1000..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:47 EST