Re: SNARE and C2 auditing under 2.5.x

From: Bernd Eckenfels (ecki@calista.eckenfels.6bone.ka-ip.net)
Date: Wed May 21 2003 - 14:26:15 EST

Next message: Baurjan Ismagulov: "reducing ATA retry count"
Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: userspace irq balancerÂ"
In reply to: Chuck Ebbert: "SNARE and C2 auditing under 2.5.x"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: SNARE and C2 auditing under 2.5.x"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: SNARE and C2 auditing under 2.5.x"
Reply: Jakob Oestergaard: "Re: SNARE and C2 auditing under 2.5.x"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In article <200305210642_MC3-1-39D2-5928@compuserve.com> you wrote:
> Nah, auditing isn't needed to run a secure system. ;)

Besides C2 is totally anachronistical, anyway.

Even Windows 2000 now offers some Protection Profiles from the Common
Criteria EAL4+FLR für ControledAccessProtectionProfile(CAPP).

Greetings
Bernd

-- 
eckes privat - http://www.eckes.org/
Project Freefire - http://www.freefire.org/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Baurjan Ismagulov: "reducing ATA retry count"
Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: userspace irq balancerÂ"
In reply to: Chuck Ebbert: "SNARE and C2 auditing under 2.5.x"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: SNARE and C2 auditing under 2.5.x"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: SNARE and C2 auditing under 2.5.x"
Reply: Jakob Oestergaard: "Re: SNARE and C2 auditing under 2.5.x"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:45 EST