David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
> Date: 19 May 2003 23:36:23 -0700
>
> I don't even think we can do that. That code was being integrated
> around the same time that our Specweb setup decided to go south on us
> and start physically frying itself.
>
>This gets more amusing by the second. Let's kill this code
>already. People who like the current algorithms can push
>them into the userspace solution.
>
>
>
Thatīs also my feeling.
After having more and more performance loss (at least for my
system/usage) and no real good solution in view to fix the problems at
this location in the kernel, I would prefer to get this thing ripped of
as soon as possible.
By now I do not see any gain with that piece of code (relative to
process/interrupt distribution). And please donīt show me benchmarks - I
know what I feel.
Userland would be first of all the right place to do any further testing.
And please - donīt tell me itīs that complicated to remove this piece of
code from source tree.
Kai.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:44 EST