From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 10:34:43 -0700
>>>>> On 16 May 2003 19:38:01 -0700, "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> said:
DaveM> I think Andrew is really suggesting to declare these two
DaveM> things in an arch header, so if one needs it to be a function
DaveM> pointer one can make it so.
I don't think this should be (purely) an arch thing. It's just as
much a driver issue. For example, HPET will pretty much work the same
on x86 and ia64, so being able to have a shared "driver" would be
useful. I agree though that it would be nice if arches that don't
care for time-interpolation at all could turn it off completely.
In the proposal below, an architecture could achieve that by turning
off CONFIG_TIME_INTERPOLATION.
That's not the issue, if I have only ONE way to do this on my
platform, I can INLINE this thing and I DO NOT need function
pointers.
I should have that option.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:37 EST