Re: [patch] futex API cleanups, futex-api-cleanup-2.5.69-A2

From: bert hubert (ahu@ds9a.nl)
Date: Mon May 19 2003 - 09:47:17 EST

On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 02:33:01PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> - start the phasing out of FUTEX_FD. This i believe is quite unclean and
> unrobust, because it attaches a new concept (futexes) to a very old
> (polling) concept. We want futex support in kernel-AIO, not in the
> polling APIs. AFAIK only NGPT uses FUTEX_FD.

I for one would want the ability to select, poll and epoll on a futex while
also being notified of availability of data on sockets. I see no alternative
even, except for messing with signals or running select with a small
timeout, introducing needless latency.

It may be weird, but it does work in practice. 'Unrobust' would be a problem
but I fail to see how this is unclean.

Thanks. 

-- 
http://www.PowerDNS.com      Open source, database driven DNS Software 
http://lartc.org           Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:34 EST