In message <20030515.171457.02279102.davem@redhat.com>,"David S. Miller" writes
:
>There is no correlation between whether you use netdevice or not
>and whether network configuration changes should be synchronized
>using the RTNL semaphore :-)
true. however, i think i would like to do both at once. but it seems
like just replacing atm_dev_lock with rtnl would probably be enough
for right now.
>Ok, I'll apply this. But long term we really need to clean out
>the cobwebs here, use RTNL, do solid module refcounting etc.
are you referring to the other bits of linux-atm like br2684, lane,
mpoa, pppoatm or something else?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:24 EST