Re: acpi spinlock breakage

From: Dave Jones (davej@codemonkey.org.uk)
Date: Thu Apr 03 2003 - 12:45:26 EST

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH][2.5] smp_call_function needs mb() - oopsable"
Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: Bugs sitting in the NEW state for more than 2 weeks"
In reply to: Shawn Starr: "Re: acpi spinlock breakage"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 12:26:12PM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
> Confirmed :-(
>
> Trying to find out what broke, but none of those members are listed even
> inside osl.c (perhaps a header down the line).

They're members of the spinlock_t struct.
That acpi_handle needs to be a spinlock_t *

Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH][2.5] smp_call_function needs mb() - oopsable"
Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: Bugs sitting in the NEW state for more than 2 weeks"
In reply to: Shawn Starr: "Re: acpi spinlock breakage"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 07 2003 - 22:00:20 EST