Re: Bad interactive behaviour in 2.5.65-66 (sched.c)

• Next message: Thomas Schlichter: "Re: NFS/ReiserFS problems 2.5.64-mbj1"
• Previous message: Roman Zippel: "Re: 64-bit kdev_t - just for playing"
• In reply to: Mike Galbraith: "Re: Bad interactive behaviour in 2.5.65-66 (sched.c)"
• Next in thread: Felipe Alfaro Solana: "Re: Bad interactive behaviour in 2.5.65-66 (sched.c)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Mike Galbraith wrote:

> At 08:35 AM 3/31/2003 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
>> What drugs are you on? 2.5.65/66 is the worst interactive kernel I've
>> ever used, it would be _embarassing_ to release a 2.6-test with such a
>> rudimentary flaw in it. IOW, a big show stopper.
>
>
> It's only horrible when you trigger the problems, otherwise it's
> wonderful.

Heh heh, yeah the anticipatory io scheduler is like that too ;)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Thomas Schlichter: "Re: NFS/ReiserFS problems 2.5.64-mbj1"
• Previous message: Roman Zippel: "Re: 64-bit kdev_t - just for playing"
• In reply to: Mike Galbraith: "Re: Bad interactive behaviour in 2.5.65-66 (sched.c)"
• Next in thread: Felipe Alfaro Solana: "Re: Bad interactive behaviour in 2.5.65-66 (sched.c)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:00:36 EST