On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 07:40:26PM +0100, Jan Dittmer wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> >That would give us one value per file, use no floating point in the
> >kernel (fake or not) and generally make things a whole lot more orderly.
> >Also, if a sensor does not have a max value (for example, I don't really
> >know if this is true), instead of having to fake a value, it can just
> >not create the file. Then userspace can easily detect this is not
> >supported, and is not a placeholder value.
> >
>
> Is this the way you want to go? Just an example for the voltages.
That looks very good to me, nice job.
Sensors developers, does this look sane?
> Btw, is it indended behaviour of sysfs, that after writing to a file,
> the size is zero?
Hm, don't know about that, I haven't seen that before. If you cat the
file after writing it, does the file size change?
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:00:29 EST