> No. The Kerntypes patch makes lots of sense even without lkcd. Once
> again I'm all in favour of adding this patch, but adding such a generic
> facility in architecture depend code is a bad idea.
I still think that due to the fact that each architecture has it own
special set of includes that this is not really a generic facility.
But anyhow if you want to do this via the lkcd patch them be it.
blue skies,
Martin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:00:27 EST