Re: Preferred way to load non-free firmware

From: Oliver Neukum (oliver@neukum.org)
Date: Wed Mar 26 2003 - 07:47:27 EST


Am Mittwoch, 26. März 2003 11:48 schrieb Nick Craig-Wood:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 08:11:46PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > 7) Encode the firmware into a header file, add it to the driver and
> > > pretend that the copyright issue doesn't exist (like it's done in the
> > > Keyspan USB driver).
> >
> > Hey, that's the way I like doing this stuff :)
>
> If you do this the Debian kernel mainainers will mercilessly rip your
> non-free driver firmware from the standard Debian kernel. At least
> that is what happened with the Keyspan :-(

That's their problem then. Or rather their users.
IMHO a maintainer's responsibility ends at kernel.org.
>From a technical point of view the firmware needs to be
in ram when you resume from sleep. If you don't care about
updating it, having it in the kernel image uses somewhat less
resources. So I'd say go for it.

        Regards
                Oliver

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:00:23 EST