Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [BK FBDEV] A few more updates.

From: Antonino Daplas (adaplas@pol.net)
Date: Wed Mar 26 2003 - 05:20:19 EST


On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 13:34, James Simmons wrote:
>
> > 3. BTW, there are too many kmalloc's/kfree's in accel_cursor() and
> > softcursor(). Personally, I would rather have 2 64-byte buffers for the
> > mask and the data in the info->cursor structure than allocating/freeing
> > memory each time the cursor flashes. However, if you prefer doing it
> > this way, the patch also includes changes so kmallocs are only done when
> > necessary. Still, accel_cursor() has unnecessary work being done, such
> > as always creating the mask bitmap, when a simple flag to monitor cursor
> > shape changes could prevent all this.
>
> I agree. The problem is the upper layer of the console system is to brain
> dead. Its either erase the cursor or redraw it again. There is no way to
> just say cursor just moved. There is a CM_MOVE but the upper layer doesn't
> even use it :-( If you look at vgacon and friends you will see they
> recreate the cursor every time the cursor blinks. Yes even vgacon.c does
> this. It is stupid and brain dead but that is the way the upper layers of
> the console work. The correct solution would be to use actually use
> CM_MOVE in the upper layers.

Even so, (and I don't really fault the console cursor as it only needs
to show, hide and move the cursor), accel_cursor() can easily monitor
shape changes. We can use a bitfield somewhere in fb_cursor(perhaps the
high 8 bits of info->fb_cursor.set?) to "remember" the current cursor
shape.

Tony

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:00:23 EST