Re: [PATCH] swap 11/13 fix unuse_pmd fixme

From: William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com)
Date: Tue Mar 25 2003 - 17:38:53 EST


On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 10:21:51PM +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> try_to_unuse drop mmlist_lock across unuse_process (with pretty dance
> of atomic_incs and mmputs of various mmlist markers, and a polite new
> cond_resched there), so unuse_process can pte_chain_alloc(GFP_KERNEL)
> and pass that down and down and down and down to unuse_pte: which
> cannot succeed more than once on a given mm (make that explicit by
> returning back up once succeeded). Preliminary checks moved up from
> unuse_pte to unuse_pmd, and done more efficiently (avoid that extra
> pte_file test added recently), swapoff spends far too long in here.
> Updated locking comments and references to try_to_swap_out.

Aha, the unlock_page() and the contorted loop breakout were wrong
in my patch. Well, that and the cleanup of fossilized comments dating
back to the Silurian is nice.

-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:00:21 EST