Re: [PATCH] concurrent inode allocation for ext2 against 2.5.64

From: William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com)
Date: Sat Mar 15 2003 - 17:06:18 EST


At some point in the past, Alex Tomas wrote:
>> struct ext2_bg_info {
>> u8 debts;
>> spinlock_t balloc_lock;
>> + spinlock_t ialloc_lock;
>> unsigned int reserved;
>> } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;

On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 01:51:58PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> hm, I wonder if this should be in a separate cacheline. We may as well use a
> single lock if they're this close together. Bill, can you test that
> sometime?

Benching now.

-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:00:44 EST