Re: [2.4] init/do_mounts.c::rd_load_image() memleak

From: Horst von Brand (vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl)
Date: Sat Mar 15 2003 - 13:40:07 EST


Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> said:
> On Fri, Mar 14 2003, Oleg Drokin wrote:

[...]

> > Do you propose somebody should go and fix all
> > if ( something )
> > kfree(something);
> > pieces of code to read just
> > kfree(something); ?

> No that would just be another pointless exercise in causing more
> annoyance for someone who has to look through patches finding that one
> hunk that breaks stuff. The recent spelling changes come to mind.

By that standard, most janitorial patches should be ditched. That way, no
cruft will ever be removed.

Instead of this extremist position, some way should be found that minimizes
this kind of friction.

-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                     Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria              +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile                Fax:  +56 32 797513
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:00:43 EST