On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 12:28:47PM -0800, Adam J. Richter wrote:
> There was tangential mention in that thread
> of a "/proc/serialdev" interface, but nobody really identified any
> real benefit to it over the existing "uart: unknown" system.
There is one benefit, which would be to get rid of some of the yucky
mess we currently have surrounding the implementation of stuff which
changes the port base address/irq.
Currently, we have to check that we're the only user, shutdown, tweak
stuff, hope it all goes to plan, and start stuff back up again. If
something fails, we have to pray we can go back to the original setup
without stuff breaking. If that fails, we mark the port "unknown".
All of this would be a lot simpler if we didn't have the port actually
open at the time we change these parameters. We could just lock the
port against opens, check no one was using it, tweak the settings,
and release the port. If the changes fail, just report the failure.
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:00:41 EST