Re: [Linux-ia64] Re: [BUG] nanosleep() granularity bumps up in 2.5.64 (was: [PATCH] settimeofday() not synchronised with gettimeofday())

From: David Mosberger (davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com)
Date: Fri Mar 14 2003 - 14:29:43 EST

Next message: Chris Friesen: "Re: Kernel setup() and initrd problems"
Previous message: Villanustre, Flavio: "linux 2.4.20 oops report 642911"
In reply to: Eric Piel: "Re: [BUG] nanosleep() granularity bumps up in 2.5.64 (was: [PATCH] settimeofday() not synchronised with gettimeofday())"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>>>>> On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 15:34:36 +0100, Eric Piel <Eric.Piel@Bull.Net> said:

Eric> Sure, I aim at porting the high resolution timers but any
Eric> annoying bug related to the time can be interesting to remove.

Great! It would be great to have someone who can focus on that.

Eric> Any idea/sugestion/patch is welcomed. Whatever, I will try to
Eric> fix this as soon as I'm back from my week end :-)

Does the x86 show the same behavior? That would be a useful start to
narrow down the problem.

--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Chris Friesen: "Re: Kernel setup() and initrd problems"
Previous message: Villanustre, Flavio: "linux 2.4.20 oops report 642911"
In reply to: Eric Piel: "Re: [BUG] nanosleep() granularity bumps up in 2.5.64 (was: [PATCH] settimeofday() not synchronised with gettimeofday())"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:00:41 EST