On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 04:31:08PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 01:18:32PM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > > Larry, this brings up something I was meaning to ask you before this
> > > thread exploded. What happens to those "logical change" numbers over
> > > time?
> >
> > They are stable in the CVS tree because the CVS tree isn't distributed.
> > So "Logical change 1.900" in the context of the exported CVS tree is
> > always the same thing. That's one advantage centralized has, things
> > don't shift around on you.
>
> OK, so the logical change numbers there are only related to the CVS
> tree, not related to revision numbers in the BK tree being converted?
Correct. The BK revs are in there though, that's what
BKrev: <long string of bits>
is in the change log.
> That makes more sense, thank you.
Hey cool, you're welcome!
-- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:00:32 EST