On Tue, 11 March 2003 11:47:22 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> If I turn #ifdef DEBUG in i2c_register_entry() into #if 1, it prints
>
> i2c-proc.o: NULL pointer when trying to install fill_inode fix!\n
>
> but boots.
That file need a lot of work anyway. On the shitlist of top stack
users, it holds ranks 3 and 9-11. Impressive.
$ make checkstack|grep i2o_proc
0xc0167db8 i2o_proc_read_ddm_table: sub $0xb40,%esp
0xc0169ec8 i2o_proc_read_lan_mcast_addr: sub $0x814,%esp
0xc016a56c i2o_proc_read_lan_alt_addr: sub $0x814,%esp
0xc01681a0 i2o_proc_read_groups: sub $0x810,%esp
0xc0168520 i2o_proc_read_users: sub $0x20c,%esp
0xc0168630 i2o_proc_read_priv_msgs: sub $0x18c,%esp
0xc016aaa4 i2o_proc_read_lan_hist_stats: sub $0x160,%esp
0xc01689a4 i2o_proc_read_ddm_identity: sub $0x130,%esp
0xc016835c i2o_proc_read_phys_device: sub $0x10c,%esp
0xc0168740 i2o_proc_read_authorized_users: sub $0x10c,%esp
BTW: It depends on CONFIG_PCI, but doesn't state it. The patch below
should fix this.
It also isn't listed in the current MAINTAINERS file. Is i2o currently
unmaintained?
Jörn
-- The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing. -- John Powell--- drivers/message/i2o/Kconfig Mon Feb 24 20:05:05 2003 +++ foo Wed Mar 12 13:46:57 2003 @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ config I2O_PROC tristate "I2O /proc support" - depends on I2O + depends on I2O && PCI help If you say Y here and to "/proc file system support", you will be able to read I2O related information from the virtual directory - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:00:30 EST