Re: bio too big device

• Next message: Mike Galbraith: "Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest"
• Previous message: Terje Eggestad: "Re: User Process and a Kernel Thread"
• In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: bio too big device"
• Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: bio too big device"
• Reply: Andre Hedrick: "Re: bio too big device"
• Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: bio too big device"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Mar 12 2003, Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> So lets dirty list the one drive by Paul G. and be done.
> Can we do that?

Who cares, really? There's not much point in doing it, we're talking 248
vs 256 sectors in reality. I think it's a _bad_ idea, lets just keep it
at 255 and avoid silly drive bugs there.

-- 
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Mike Galbraith: "Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest"
• Previous message: Terje Eggestad: "Re: User Process and a Kernel Thread"
• In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: bio too big device"
• Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: bio too big device"
• Reply: Andre Hedrick: "Re: bio too big device"
• Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: bio too big device"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:00:30 EST