Re: [PATCH][ATM] obselete some atm_vcc members

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Mon Mar 10 2003 - 00:11:08 EST


   From: chas williams <chas@locutus.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
   Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2003 19:50:05 -0500
   
   the spinlock isnt new. the atm code has always had a global spinlock.
   i submitted a patch a couple weeks ago to convert the spinlock to a
   semaphore (so things would atleast work for now while i decide how to fix
   it the right way). so my confusion is 'new spinlock'. what new spinlock?
   did i miss something?

The important bit is that the patches you sent me didn't
apply, the rejects were in the sections that had references
to the older style atm device locking.

Whether the older style was one thing or another is irelevant.

The main point is that you need to send me clean patches
that actually apply to current 2.5.x trees :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:00:20 EST