Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction.

From: Dave Jones (davej@codemonkey.org.uk)
Date: Sun Mar 09 2003 - 19:11:29 EST

Next message: Jeremy Fitzhardinge: "Re: Kernel bug in dcache.h:266; 2.5.64, EIP at sysfs_remove_dir"
Previous message: Adam J. Richter: "Re: 2.5.64bk5: X86_PC + HIGHMEM boot failure"
In reply to: J.A. Magallon: "Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction."
Next in thread: J.A. Magallon: "Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction."
Reply: J.A. Magallon: "Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 11:45:52PM +0100, J.A. Magallon wrote:

> If you do not need gcc-2.95 support, you can use anonymous unions:
> I have tested on gcc-3.0, 3.2.2, RH gcc-2.96-98, and 2.95.2. Only 2.95.2
> fails.

What about the magick ancient version that sparc uses ?

Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeremy Fitzhardinge: "Re: Kernel bug in dcache.h:266; 2.5.64, EIP at sysfs_remove_dir"
Previous message: Adam J. Richter: "Re: 2.5.64bk5: X86_PC + HIGHMEM boot failure"
In reply to: J.A. Magallon: "Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction."
Next in thread: J.A. Magallon: "Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction."
Reply: J.A. Magallon: "Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:00:20 EST