Re: Kernel tuning for high latency satellite link??

From: Ben Greear (greearb@candelatech.com)
Date: Sat Mar 01 2003 - 17:45:00 EST

Next message: Brad Laue: "Re: Cisco Aironet 340 oops with 2.4.20"
Previous message: JP Pozzi izzop.org: "Re: Bug in APIC on 2.4.20 kernel"
In reply to: Andrew McGregor: "Re: Kernel tuning for high latency satellite link??"
Next in thread: Matti Aarnio: "Re: Kernel tuning for high latency satellite link??"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Andrew McGregor wrote:
> It should do OK by default, but you might want to read RFC 3150 for some
> ideas for things to do to help.
>
> Andrew

Testing I have done shows it will probably NOT be ok by default, especially
if you have any significant bandwidth on your satellite link. I would suggest
increasing the tcp_[rw]mem buffers at least.

Ben

-- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com> President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Brad Laue: "Re: Cisco Aironet 340 oops with 2.4.20"
Previous message: JP Pozzi izzop.org: "Re: Bug in APIC on 2.4.20 kernel"
In reply to: Andrew McGregor: "Re: Kernel tuning for high latency satellite link??"
Next in thread: Matti Aarnio: "Re: Kernel tuning for high latency satellite link??"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 07 2003 - 22:00:17 EST