Re: [PATCH][ATM] cli() for net/atm/lec.c

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Sat Feb 22 2003 - 02:22:12 EST

Next message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: Strange performance change 59 -> 61/62"
Previous message: paul raj: "kernel"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH][ATM] cli() for net/atm/lec.c"
Next in thread: chas williams: "Re: [PATCH][ATM] cli() for net/atm/lec.c"
Reply: chas williams: "Re: [PATCH][ATM] cli() for net/atm/lec.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 17:57:02 +0000

> @@ -634,6 +635,7 @@
> dev->get_stats = lec_get_stats;
> dev->set_multicast_list = NULL;
> dev->do_ioctl = NULL;
> + spin_lock_init(&lec_arp_spinlock);

   This is still superflous..

True, Chas can you cook up a new patch with this deleted?
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: Strange performance change 59 -> 61/62"
Previous message: paul raj: "kernel"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH][ATM] cli() for net/atm/lec.c"
Next in thread: chas williams: "Re: [PATCH][ATM] cli() for net/atm/lec.c"
Reply: chas williams: "Re: [PATCH][ATM] cli() for net/atm/lec.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:35 EST