Re: [RFC] Is an alternative module interface needed/possible?

From: Werner Almesberger (wa@almesberger.net)
Date: Thu Feb 20 2003 - 09:06:45 EST

Adam J. Richter wrote:
> Anyhow, my point is that removing a piece of hardware
> does not require that the corresponding module be unloaded
> immediately.

Nor does the use of a module require the presence of any
non-generic hardware in the first place (e.g. net/sched/,
netfilter, PPP, etc.) :-)

- Werner 

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________________
 / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina         wa@almesberger.net /
/_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:29 EST