[PATCH] fix Documentation/cli-sti-removal.txt thinko

From: Randy.Dunlap (rddunlap@osdl.org)
Date: Mon Feb 17 2003 - 16:30:28 EST

Hi,

Please apply to 2.5.61.

The 3 lines being deleted are repeated from above (in same file).
I pulled the 2 lines being added from an earlier version of the patch. 

--
~Randy

patch_name:	cli-fixdoc.patch
patch_version:	2003-02-17.13:15:29
author:		Randy.Dunlap <rddunlap@osdl.org>
description:	correct cli-sti-removal.txt cut-n-paste'os
product:	Linux
product_versions: linux-2561
changelog:	_
URL:		_
requires:	_
conflicts:	_
diffstat:	=
 cli-sti-removal.txt |    5 ++---
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff -Naur ./Documentation/cli-sti-removal.txt%CLI ./Documentation/cli-sti-removal.txt
--- ./Documentation/cli-sti-removal.txt%CLI	Fri Feb 14 15:51:21 2003
+++ ./Documentation/cli-sti-removal.txt	Mon Feb 17 13:15:09 2003
@@ -121,9 +121,8 @@
 
 another related change is that synchronize_irq() now takes a parameter:
 synchronize_irq(irq). This change too has the purpose of making SMP
-to make the transition easier, we've still kept the cli(), sti(),
-save_flags() and restore_flags() macros defined on UP systems - but
-their usage will be phased out until the 2.6 kernel is released.
+synchronization more lightweight - this way you can wait for your own
+interrupt handler to finish, no need to wait for other IRQ sources.
 
 
 why were these changes done? The main reason was the architectural burden
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:19 EST