Re: Performance of ext3 on large systems

From: Sean Neakums (sneakums@zork.net)
Date: Mon Feb 17 2003 - 10:20:27 EST

Next message: Daniel Heater: "Re: Synchronous signal delivery.."
Previous message: Muli Ben-Yehuda: "hidden assumptions in generic_file_write"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: Performance of ext3 on large systems"
Next in thread: John Bradford: "Re: Performance of ext3 on large systems"
Reply: John Bradford: "Re: Performance of ext3 on large systems"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

commence Andrew Morton quotation:

> "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com> wrote:
>>
>> (look at system time ... eeek!)
>
> Can we just say that ext3's talents lie elsewhere?
>
> I've got some stuff which helps a bit, but nobody has had the time
> to implement the significant overhaul which is needed here.
>
> noatime would help.

ext3 doesn't implement noatime!? Hurg...

-- 
 /                          |
[|] Sean Neakums            | Size *does* matter.
[|] <sneakums@zork.net>     | That's why I use Emacs.
 \                          |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Daniel Heater: "Re: Synchronous signal delivery.."
Previous message: Muli Ben-Yehuda: "hidden assumptions in generic_file_write"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: Performance of ext3 on large systems"
Next in thread: John Bradford: "Re: Performance of ext3 on large systems"
Reply: John Bradford: "Re: Performance of ext3 on large systems"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:18 EST