Re: [PATCH] [RESEND 6] sysctls for PA-RISC

From: Rik van Riel (riel@imladris.surriel.com)
Date: Sun Feb 16 2003 - 20:42:17 EST

Next message: Kai Germaschewski: "Re: [PATCH] Move __this_module to xxx.mod.c"
Previous message: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: Annoying /proc/net/dev rollovers."
In reply to: Matthew Wilcox: "[PATCH] [RESEND 6] sysctls for PA-RISC"
Next in thread: Russell King: "Re: [PATCH] [RESEND 6] sysctls for PA-RISC"
Reply: Russell King: "Re: [PATCH] [RESEND 6] sysctls for PA-RISC"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

> Can anyone think why Linus isn't applying this patch?

Not a clue, the only thing I can think of is that Linus might
like other people to look at the patch before applying it...

Linus, Matthew's patch only adds some (PA-RISC conditional)
sysctls to the kernel and is otherwise harmless. Safe to apply.

cheers,

Rik

-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/		http://guru.conectiva.com/
Current spamtrap:  <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Kai Germaschewski: "Re: [PATCH] Move __this_module to xxx.mod.c"
Previous message: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: Annoying /proc/net/dev rollovers."
In reply to: Matthew Wilcox: "[PATCH] [RESEND 6] sysctls for PA-RISC"
Next in thread: Russell King: "Re: [PATCH] [RESEND 6] sysctls for PA-RISC"
Reply: Russell King: "Re: [PATCH] [RESEND 6] sysctls for PA-RISC"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:16 EST