Muli Ben-Yehuda <mulix@mulix.org> writes:
>> I have no idea if that's what wli meant, but -1UL is only "all ones"
>> in a 2's complement binary representation.
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 12:50:34PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> No. Wraparound of unsigned types is well-defined. -1UL must be the
> largest possible unsigned long value, which must consist of only 1
> bits (except for possible padding bits).
> Of course, no machines with ones-complement (or padding bits, or
> integer trap representations, or any of the other ISO braindamages)
> exist, so this is mostly irrelevant anyway.
In the "obvious" sense, -1UL is an oxymoron, as -1 is inherently signed,
and the "UL" says "unsigned".
It's aesthetic. It's a violation of what I consider good taste to
do signed bit twiddling on an unsigned value and/or vice-versa.
Regardless of what ISO and/or Linux may or may not support, the habits
ingrained in me wrt. portability say the assumption must not be made.
YMMV.
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:14 EST