Re: openbkweb-0.0

From: Pavel Janík (Pavel@Janik.cz)
Date: Sun Feb 16 2003 - 06:17:22 EST

Next message: Adrian Bunk: "[2.5 patch] isdn_net_lib.c must include isdn_concap.h"
Previous message: David Woodhouse: "Re: openbkweb-0.0"
Next in thread: Gaël Le Mignot: "Re: openbkweb-0.0"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 07:30:39 -0800

Larry,

> Third of all, you could be right, I could be wrong, and I'm still right.
> We give the software away for *free*. We *own* it. If it turns out that
> people want to behave like little children and not play nice, no problem,
> we'll promptly fork the tree and you are stuck with whatever version you
> had at the point you decided to not play nice.

you are talking about forking BK, not Linux. Right?

Your last sentence seems to me like from Microsoft.

-- Pavel Janík

I'm glad I'm not as fat and slow running as Emacs (20)... -- Lars G. T. Jorgensen in gnu.emacs.help - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Adrian Bunk: "[2.5 patch] isdn_net_lib.c must include isdn_concap.h"
Previous message: David Woodhouse: "Re: openbkweb-0.0"
Next in thread: Gaël Le Mignot: "Re: openbkweb-0.0"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:14 EST