Re: [PATCH] CFQ scheduler, #2

From: Mike Galbraith (
Date: Sat Feb 15 2003 - 06:40:55 EST

At 09:22 AM 2/15/2003 -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
>On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>>I gave this a burn, and under hefty load it seems to provide a bit of
>>anti-thrash benefit.
>Judging from your log, it ends up stalling kswapd and
>dramatically increases the number of times that normal
>processes need to go into the pageout code.
>If this provides an anti-thrashing benefit, something's
>wrong with the VM in 2.5 ;)

Which number are you looking at?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 15 2003 - 22:01:01 EST