Re: [PATCH] CFQ scheduler, #2

From: Mike Galbraith (efault@gmx.de)
Date: Sat Feb 15 2003 - 05:00:28 EST


At 03:19 PM 2/14/2003 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
>Hi,

Greetings

>The version posted the other day did fair queueing of requests between
>processes, but it did not help to provide fair request allocation. This
>version does that too, results are rather remarkable. In addition, the
>following changes were made:
>
>- Fix lost request problem with rbtree aliasing. The default io
> scheduler in 2.5.60 has the same bug, a fix has been sent separetely
> to Linus that addresses this.
>
>- Add front merging.
>
>- Missing queue_lock grab in get_request_wait() before checking request
> list count. Again, a generic kernel bug. A patch will be sent to Linus
> to address that as well.

I gave this a burn, and under hefty load it seems to provide a bit of
anti-thrash benefit.

i(dang, wish I had pine/vi for winders box)log data attached

         -Mike


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 15 2003 - 22:01:01 EST