Re: Synchronous signal delivery..

From: Keith Adamson (
Date: Thu Feb 13 2003 - 22:54:22 EST

On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 22:11, Keith Adamson wrote:
> How about also including a connect()/bind() interface so that
> you can sort of have a "sockets for signals" type interface.
> This seems like a nice type of interface for synchronization.
> And maybe use send()/recv() instead of read()/write(). Or am
> I on crack:)

I guess what I'm trying to say is that if you want to generalize
a synchronous signal delivery interface I think the networking
interface is a better paradigm than the filesystem interface.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 15 2003 - 22:00:51 EST