Re: [2.4.20][2.5.60] /proc/interrupts comparsion - two irqs for i8042?

From: David Woodhouse (dwmw2@infradead.org)
Date: Wed Feb 12 2003 - 10:42:38 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.5.60 "Badness in kobject_register at lib/kobject.c:152""
Previous message: Pete Loscocco: "Re: [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.59"
In reply to: Shawn Starr: "[2.4.20][2.5.60] /proc/interrupts comparsion - two irqs for i8042?"
Next in thread: Brian Gerst: "Re: [2.4.20][2.5.60] /proc/interrupts comparsion - two irqs for i8042?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 15:36, Shawn Starr wrote:

> Interesting, why are we using two interrupts for the i8042 (keyboard).

Because the mouse is connected to the i8042 too.

-- 
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.5.60 "Badness in kobject_register at lib/kobject.c:152""
Previous message: Pete Loscocco: "Re: [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.59"
In reply to: Shawn Starr: "[2.4.20][2.5.60] /proc/interrupts comparsion - two irqs for i8042?"
Next in thread: Brian Gerst: "Re: [2.4.20][2.5.60] /proc/interrupts comparsion - two irqs for i8042?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 15 2003 - 22:00:42 EST