On Tuesday 11 February 2003 14:57, Dave Jones wrote:
> Running fsx & fsstress in parallel gets a load of oopsen in the
> logs, here's the first one..
>
> Dave
Thanks Dave,
I think I know what the problem is here. I tried to adapt some code I
used at unmount for the sync_fs call, but I screwed up. The routine is
waiting until all the journal writes have completed but it doesn't
anticipate (or prevent) new activity. The code times out after a while
because a BUG at unmount time is easier to track down than a hang.
I'll work on a real patch, but this should work in the mean time.
(Pardon the compiler warning.)
===== fs/jfs/super.c 1.33 vs edited =====
--- 1.33/fs/jfs/super.c Fri Jan 17 14:17:14 2003
+++ edited/fs/jfs/super.c Tue Feb 11 15:36:25 2003
@@ -396,7 +396,6 @@
.write_inode = jfs_write_inode,
.delete_inode = jfs_delete_inode,
.put_super = jfs_put_super,
- .sync_fs = jfs_sync_fs,
.write_super_lockfs = jfs_write_super_lockfs,
.unlockfs = jfs_unlockfs,
.statfs = jfs_statfs,
-- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 15 2003 - 22:00:36 EST