Re: [Lse-tech] gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance

From: Falk Hueffner (
Date: Mon Feb 10 2003 - 15:49:19 EST

Albert Cahalan <> writes:

> BTW, in case any gcc hacker is paying attention, the documentation
> fails to mention the gcc version required for this or any other
> attribute. Also it would be nice to have an option to ditch the
> (char*) exception; it's junk when you have __may_alias__.

I don't think a switch that makes standard compliant source break in
potentially very subtle ways is a good idea. Just use "restrict".

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 15 2003 - 22:00:29 EST