Re: [PATCH] 2.5.59 morse code panics

From: Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de)
Date: Fri Jan 31 2003 - 10:34:55 EST


Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:

> On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 13:22, Dave Jones wrote:
> > Or you could put down the crackpipe and run a serial console between
> > the two boxes. Or even netconsole would make more sense
> > (and be a lot more reliable).
>
> A lot of newer laptops do not have serial ports. While morse code may
> be a little silly the general purpose hook it needs to be done
> cleanly is considerably more useful

And how many users and how many kernel hackers are able to decode
morse on the fly? Are you going to explain to users
"to debug this you'll need to learn morse" ?

If you want to make debugging easy for laptops write a USB or firewire
console. Firewire is actually quite interesting because it can even
do DMA, so you could peek into the memory.

Morse is not helpful.

I admit I was the on who got this ball running by suggesting it "as an
exercise for the reader" in the original panic blink code, but
guys this was intended as a JOKE, not serious. Please get over it
and don't merge that silly code.

Thanks,
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 31 2003 - 22:00:25 EST