On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Scott Murray wrote:
> On 28 Jan 2003, Rusty Lynch wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 23:50, Stanley Wang wrote:
> > > Hi, Scott,
> > > After reading your CPCI Hot Swap support codes, I have a suggestion
> > > to enhance it:
> > > How about to make it be full hot swap compliant?
> > > I mean we could also do some works like "disable_slot" when we receive
> > > the #ENUM & EXT signal. Hence the user could yank the hot swap board
> > > without issuing command on the console.
> > > How do you think about it?
> > >
> >
> > How does this behavior translate to "full hot swap compliant"? I assume
> > you are talking about wording from PICMG 2.16, which in my opinion
>
> Slight nitpick, I'm pretty sure you mean PICMG 2.12 here, it's the
> (somewhat lame IMO :) hotswap software spec, 2.16 is the packet switched
> backplane stuff.
Yeah, I mean PCIMG 2.12 here.
Regards,
-Stan
-- Opinions expressed are those of the author and do not represent Intel Corporation- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 31 2003 - 22:00:23 EST