Re: [PATCH] (1/4) 2.5.59 fast reader/writer lock for gettimeofday

From: Andrew Morton (akpm@digeo.com)
Date: Wed Jan 29 2003 - 03:41:33 EST


Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> wrote:
>
>
> > These need to be mb(), not wmb(), if you want the bits in between
> > to actually happen in between, as with your xtime example. At
> > present there's nothing stoping xtime from being *read* before
> > your read from pre_sequence happens.
>
> But with frlocks we synchronise writers with a spinlock, so shouldnt it
> provide that synchronisation?
>

Richard is referring to the new fr_write_begin/end code, which doesn't take a
spinlock because it assumes that writer serialisation has been provided by
external means.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 31 2003 - 22:00:21 EST