Re: {sys_,/dev/}epoll waiting timeout

From: Davide Libenzi (davidel@xmailserver.org)
Date: Tue Jan 28 2003 - 18:00:01 EST


On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Andi Kleen wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 02:24:52PM -0800, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > > Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> writes:
> > > >
> > > > Which suggests that all the architectures are fine with all these
> > > > "int" returns, except IA64.
> > >
> > > x86-64 needs long returns too.
> > >
> > > I think I fixed all of them, if you noticed any missing please let me now.
> >
> > #define __NR_epoll_create ???
> > #define __NR_epoll_ctl ???
> > #define __NR_epoll_wait ???
> >
> > That in 2.5.59 return "int". I posted the patch to make them return
> > "long" to Linus ( Andrew got it ) this weekend.
>
> Sorry I meant I fixed all x86-64 specific syscalls returning int.

I know Andi, I was trying to make you notice that those are missing from
the x86-64 arch :)

- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 31 2003 - 22:00:20 EST