Re: bug in select() (was Re: {sys_,/dev/}epoll waiting timeout)

From: Davide Libenzi (davidel@xmailserver.org)
Date: Tue Jan 28 2003 - 17:15:33 EST


On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Jamie Lokier wrote:

> Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > ( if Tms > 0 )
>
> Which is unfortunate, because that doesn't allow for a value of Tms ==
> 0 which is needed when you want to sleep and wake up on every jiffie
> on systems where HZ >= 1000. Tms == 0 is taken already, to mean do
> not wait at all.

Waking up every jiffie does not make a lot of sense in most applications
since they probably prefer to deal with seconds and its derivates, to have
a predictable behavior on different systems. Functions like
poll/select/epoll are simply not the right solution if you want to cut the
microsecond on sleep times.

- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 31 2003 - 22:00:20 EST