OK, you win.
Were can I find these simple tools that modify a kernel that does not
support loadable modules as easily as insmod modifies a kernel that does
support them?
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 10:14, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Richard B. Tilley (Brad) wrote:
> > Then, not supporting loadable modules *is* more secure. By not
> > supporting them, you are decreasing the ease in which the kernel can be
> > modified. There are fewer people who can "fiddle with memory by hand"
> > than there are that can insert a loadable module... a lot fewer, don't
> > you agree?
>
> No, there are simple tools to do that which are just as easy to use as
> insmod.
>
> Wichert.
>
> --
> Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net> http://www.wiggy.net/
> A random hacker
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 31 2003 - 22:00:19 EST