Re: [patch 2.5] VGA IO on systems with multiple PCI IO domains

• Next message: Terje Eggestad: "Re: debate on 700 threads vs asynchronous code"
• Previous message: Ivan Kokshaysky: "Re: [PATCH] isa_virt_to_bus and co on Alpha"
• In reply to: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: [patch 2.5] VGA IO on systems with multiple PCI IO domains"
• Next in thread: Ivan Kokshaysky: "Re: [patch 2.5] VGA IO on systems with multiple PCI IO domains"
• Reply: Ivan Kokshaysky: "Re: [patch 2.5] VGA IO on systems with multiple PCI IO domains"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> What about some kind of ioport_remap() that would take a pci_bus and an
> port range as arguments ? If pci_bus is NULL, that would match a
> "legacy" ISA bus (non-PCI machine or default ISA bus for machines where
> that makes sense).
>
> What do you think ?

Looks good, but maybe we should use some other functions than iob() et al.
to do I/O on the remapped addresses.

                                Have a nice fortnight

-- 
Martin `MJ' Mares   <mj@ucw.cz>   http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/
Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth
Never make any mistaeks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Terje Eggestad: "Re: debate on 700 threads vs asynchronous code"
• Previous message: Ivan Kokshaysky: "Re: [PATCH] isa_virt_to_bus and co on Alpha"
• In reply to: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: [patch 2.5] VGA IO on systems with multiple PCI IO domains"
• Next in thread: Ivan Kokshaysky: "Re: [patch 2.5] VGA IO on systems with multiple PCI IO domains"
• Reply: Ivan Kokshaysky: "Re: [patch 2.5] VGA IO on systems with multiple PCI IO domains"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 31 2003 - 22:00:16 EST