>>>>> Andrew Morton (AM) writes:
AM> That's correct. Reads are usually synchronous and writes are
AM> rarely synchronous.
AM> The most common place where the kernel forces a user process to
AM> wait on completion of a write is actually in unlink (truncate,
AM> really). Because truncate must wait for in-progress I/O to
AM> complete before allowing the filesystem to free (and potentially
AM> reuse) the affected blocks.
looks like I miss something here.
why do wait for write completion in truncate?
getblk (blockmap);
getblk (bitmap);
set 0 in blockmap->b_data[N];
mark_buffer_dirty (blockmap);
clear_bit (N, &bitmap);
mark_buffer_dirty (bitmap);
isn't that enough?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 31 2003 - 22:00:12 EST