James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com said:
> Is this really safe? Maybe ARM needs to use GFP_ATOMIC all the time
> for a specific reason, such as where and how it maps the cpu side
> mappings of the memory?
According to Russell King, yes.
The PA-RISC one should also be correct. Actually, to be honest, there's a
longstanding issue in the pa-risc code where we can potentially allocate a
page table using GFP_KERNEL in pci_alloc_consistent() when we obtain the
mapping resources. I can argue that we never go down this path in practice,
but it does make GFP_ATOMIC allocations look unsafe on the platform.
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:50 EST