Re: [PATCH] Make `obsolete params' work correctly if MODULE_SYMBOL_PREFIX is non-empty

From: Miles Bader (miles@lsi.nec.co.jp)
Date: Fri Jan 10 2003 - 05:39:03 EST

Next message: Henning P. Schmiedehausen: "Re: UnitedLinux violating GPL?"
Previous message: Antonino Daplas: "Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] rotation."
In reply to: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] Make `obsolete params' work correctly if MODULE_SYMBOL_PREFIX is non-empty"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

BTW, I noticed that there's actually a bug in my patch -- it assumes
the length of MODULE_SYMBOL_PREFIX is 1. So change:

char sym_name[strlen(obsparm[i].name) + 2];

to:

char sym_name[strlen(obsparm[i].name) + sizeof MODULE_SYMBOL_PREFIX];

-Miles

-- 
Would you like fries with that?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Henning P. Schmiedehausen: "Re: UnitedLinux violating GPL?"
Previous message: Antonino Daplas: "Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] rotation."
In reply to: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] Make `obsolete params' work correctly if MODULE_SYMBOL_PREFIX is non-empty"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:32 EST