Hi,
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 12:16, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Well personally I prefer slow-and-safe. But we could make 2.4
> do what 2.5 is doing - one pass through the superblocks to start
> the syncs and a second pass to wait on them all.
The 2.5 approach has the problem that it can start queuing writeback for
multiple fs'es on the same disk at the same time --- I wouldn't be
surprised if it increases thrashing in that case. But I guess I'm not
too concerned about sync() performance itself, as long as the in-kernel
background writeback is being done sensibly.
> This is fragile stuff though....
Yep.
--Stephen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:31 EST