Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface

From: Rusty Russell (rusty@rustcorp.com.au)
Date: Fri Jan 03 2003 - 00:10:19 EST

Next message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] Deprecate exec_usermodehelper, fix request_module."
In reply to: Kronos: "[RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In message <20030102225010.GA1197@dreamland.darkstar.lan> you write:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on net/sched to convert it to new module interface. I'm
> going to add a new field 'owner' to struct Qdisc_ops.

Hmm, I thought the sched stuff all runs under the network brlock? If
so, it doesn't need to be held in, since it's not preemptible.

I haven't checked, though...
Rusty.

--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] Deprecate exec_usermodehelper, fix request_module."
In reply to: Kronos: "[RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:20 EST